People v. Frazier
THE PEOPLE v. ELTON FRAZIER
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a companion case to People v. Peck, ante, p. 638, [185 Pac. 881]. [1] On a separate trial this defendant was convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary for an indeterminate period. The appeal is from said judgment. No argument, either oral or written, has been submitted in this court in behalf of appellant. His counsel appeared at the time set for the hearing, but declined to make any argument. We have, nevertheless, examined the record and have found abundant evidence to support the verdict. It may be stated further that we have discovered no prejudicial error, and we know of no reason why we should disturb the conclusion reached in the trial court.
The judgment is affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Peck Crim. No. 482. · 1919-10-18