Coward v. De Cray
MARY V. COWARD, and v. AGNES DE CRAY, as etc., and Respondents CATHERINE L. CODY, and
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Thomas J. Lennon (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Lennon
LENNON, P. J.
In this case it has been stipulated by the parties, and in accordance therewith, ordered by the court, that the appeal should be submitted to the court for decision upon the briefs and transcript filed and arguments made in an appeal involving the same parties and the same questions, numbered 2530 and entitled, Mary V. Coward, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Agnes De Cray, as Executrix, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants; Catherine L. Cody et al., Defendants and Respondents.
A decision in the above-entitled appeal, No. 2530, has this day been rendered and filed (ante, p. 290, [176 Pac. 56]), and for the reasons given therein, and in accordance with the stipulation and order filed herein, the judgment herein is affirmed.
Sturtevant, J., pro tern., and Beasly, J., pro tern,., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Coward v. De Cray Civ. No. 2530. · 1918-09-27