Cudahy Packing Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co.
CUDAHY PACKING COMPANY v. R. ROSENBERG & SONS CO.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Frank H. Kerrigan (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Kerrigan
KERRIGAN, J.
The questions involved in this appeal are in all respects similar to those presented in Armour & Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co. (No. 2104), ante, p. 773, [173 Pac. 404], and upon the authority of that ease the judgment is reversed.
Zook, J., pro tern., and Beasly, J., pro tern., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on May 13, 1918, and a petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 10, 1918.
Cites, in this corpus
- Armour & Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co. Civ. No. 2104. · 1918-04-13