Halsted v. Oakland Bank of Savings
JAMES D. HALSTED v. OAKLAND BANK OF SAVINGS, Respondents JAMES D. HALSTED v. CENTRAL SAVINGS BANK
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
The facts of these two cases are such as to present the same question that we have this day decided in James D. Halsted et al. v. Central Savings Bank, ante, p. 500, [172 Pac. 613], numbered in this court No. 2302. In all the eases the plaintiffs, as executors of the last will of James M. Halsted, deceased, are seeking to establish an interest in certain savings bank deposits belonging to the deceased in his lifetime, but in which he had created an interest in favor of Anna N. Collins amounting upon his death to absolute and sole ownership.
Upon the authority of the above-mentioned case of Halsted et al. v. Central Savings Bank, No. 2302, the judgment in each of these cases is affirmed.
A petition to have the causes heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 9, 1918.
Cites, in this corpus
- Halsted v. Central Savings Bank Civ. 2302; Civ. 2304 · 1918-03-12