Stewart v. Andrews
GERTIE STEWART v. WILLEDD ANDREWS
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is said to he an appeal from an order granting plaintiff’s motion to set aside the judgment and granting permission to plaintiff to file an amended complaint. There is no record other than a typewritten transcript, which we may assume was prepared in accordance with section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. Appellant has not complied with section 953c of the Cole of Civil Procedure, which provides that upon such a record the parties must “print in their briefs, or in a supplement appended thereto, such portions of the record as they desire to call to the attention of the court.” The brief for appellant is absolutely deficient in that it contains none of the evidence and contains no part of the record. On the authority of Jones v. American Potash. Co., ante, p. 128, [169 Pac. 397], and cases there cited, the order is affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Jones v. American Potash Co. Civ. No. 1910. · 1917-10-25