People v. Warner
THE PEOPLE v. GEORGE WARNER
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Albert G. Burnett (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Burnett
BURNETT, J.
This case is identical in its facts with the case of People v. Lensen, ante, p. 336, [167 Pac. 406], recently decided by this court, and the same points are made upon this appeal for a reversal of the judgment and order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. An extended opinion, therefore, becomes unnecessary. Upon the authority of the Lensen case the judgment and order are reversed.
Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Lensen Crim. No. 396. · 1917-07-18