Beecham v. Burns
WILLIAM E. BEECHAM v. C. Y. BURNS, City Clerk
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is said to be an action to compel appellant, as city clerk of the city of Venice, to certify to the sufficiency of a certain recall petition for the recall of one Carlos L. Smart, a trustee of that city. In all respects necessary to be considered for the purposes of a decision, this case is like No. 2387, Beecham v. Burns, ante, p. 754, [168 Pac. 1058], in which our decision is this day filed. Upon the authority of that decision, the judgment in this action is affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Beecham v. Burns Civ. No. 2387. · 1917-10-04