Superior California Fruit Land Co. v. May
SUPERIOR CALIFORNIA FRUIT LAND COMPANY v. E. F. MAY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Plummer (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Plummer
PLUMMER, J., pro tem.
This action, No. 1578, is a companion cause of action to No. 1577, Superior California Fruit Land Company v. Grossman, ante, p. 357, this day decided, *805and for the reasons therein given the judgment in this action is hereby affirmed.
Chipman, P. J., and Burnett, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 12, 1917.