Morris v. Hartley
ISADOR F. MORRIS v. A. F. HARTLEY, Defendants F. J. BETHEL
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Chipman (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Chipman
CHIPMAN, P. J.
This is an appeal from the order denying defendant Bethel’s motion for a new trial and, by stipulation, was presented in the briefs filed in the appeal from the judgment, No. 1116, this day decided. For the reasons therein presented, the order is affirmed.
Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on December 31, 1914, in an opinion reported in connection with the opinion in Morris v. Hartley (Civ. No. 1116), ante, p. 61. [146 Pac. 73].
Cites, in this corpus
- Morris v. Hartley Civ. No. 1116. · 1914-11-30
Cited by
- Morris v. Hartley Civ. No. 1116. · 1914-11-30