In re White
In the Matter of the Application of JAMES WHITE for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
- Area
- other
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Petitioner is imprisoned by the sheriff of San Joaquin County by virtue of an information, filed in the superior court of said county, charging him with the commission of the crime of grand larceny. Petitioner claims that he was committed by the magistrate without probable cause and has sent with his petition a certified copy of the evidence taken before the committing magistrate.
We have given the evidence careful examination and are satisfied that it is sufficient to justify the magistrate in issuing the commitment.
The writ is denied.