Bragg v. Cumming
ROBERT BRAGG, of the Last Will of Mary Jane Bragg v. ELIZABETH BRAGG CUMMING
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Frank H. Kerrigan (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Kerrigan
KERRIGAN, J.
The facts in this case as presented at the trial were identical with those produced and considered by the trial court and reviewed by this court in the case of Bragg v. Martenstein, (Civ. No. 1487), ante, p. 199, [143 Pac. 79]. The reasoning and conclusions of this court in that case are in all respects applicable to the case at bar. It follows that the judgment and order herein must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial, and it is so ordered.
Lennon, P. J., and Richards, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 26, 1914.
Cites, in this corpus
- Bragg v. Martenstein Civ No. 1487. · 1914-07-28