Blair v. Brownstone Oil & Refining Co.
CHAS. H. BLAIR v. BROWNSTONE OIL AND REFINING COMPANY (a Corporation)
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order denying a new trial. The record shows that notice of appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial was duly given; that within a day or two succeeding an undertaking on appeal from the judgment was filed. Respondents contend that the appeal from the order should be dismissed because the same was not included in the undertaking given. Upon the authority of Mitchell v. California etc. Steamship Co., 154 Cal. 731, [99 Pac. 202], the motion must be denied. It is there held that the notice of appeal is sufficient regardless of the filing of the undertaking.
Motion denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- Mitchell v. California & Oregon Steamship Co. S.F. No. 5003. · 1908-12-21