Nutley v. Metropolis Construction Co.
WILLIAM NUTLEY v. METROPOLIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Corporation
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Chipman (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Chipman
CHIPMAN, P. J.
Plaintiff moves to dismiss the -appeal in the above-entitled action on the ground that no transcript of the record on appeal from.the judgment in said action has been filed and more than forty days have elapsed since the perfection of such appeal.
With the exception as to the amount of the judgment recovered by plaintiff, the facts are the same as in Union Lumber Co. v. Metropolis Construction Co. (No. 751), ante, p. 584, [110 Pac. 329], in which a similar motion was this day decided.
Conformably with the decision in that case, the appeal is dismissed.
Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Union Lumber Co. v. Metropolis Construction Co. Civ. No. 751. · 1910-06-13