Pacific Union Club v. Palatine Insurance
PACIFIC UNION CLUB v. PALATINE INSURANCE COMPANY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Chipman (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Chipman
CHIPMAN, P. J.
Appellant states in its opening brief that the facts in this case are identical with those in Pacific Union Club v. Commercial Union Assurance Company, ante, p. 503, [107 Pac. 728], this day decided.
Upon the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.
Burnett, J., and Hart, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Pacific Union Club v. Commercial Union Assurance Co. Civ. No. 666. · 1910-01-26