San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.
SAN FRANCISCO SULPHUR COMPANY, a Corporation v. AETNA INDEMNITY COMPANY, (Superior Court No. 11)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Frank H. Kerrigan (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Kerrigan
KERRIGAN, J.
In the above-entitled cause it has been stipulated by the respective parties that the matters to be determined by this court are identical with the matters to be determined in the cause bearing the same title but numbered in the trial court No. 3619, ante, p. 695, [106 Pac. 111], and that the judgment of this court may be the same in both cases. In the case numbered in the trial court No. 3619 we have this day affirmed the judgment and order appealed from. It is therefore ordered in accordance with the aforesaid stipulation that in the ease numbered No. 11 in the trial court, the judgment and order are affirmed.
Hall, J., and Cooper, P. J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co. Civ. No. 645. · 1909-11-10
Cited by
- Credit Association v. Griffin Civ. No. 1891. · 1917-01-26