gno.law

Victor Power & Mining Co. v. Zerr

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 652 · 1909-10-18 · Published · 11 Cal. App. 503

VICTOR POWER AND MINING COMPANY, a Corporation v. G. ZERR

Area
civil
Panel
Hart (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Hart

HART, J.

is an action, ejectment in form, and the-appeal is from the judgment and an order refusing to grant the motion of the defendant to set aside the default entered against him for failure to answer the complaint within the-time allowed by the court upon overruling the demurrer to-said complaint and to vacate the judgment entered upon said, default.

The facts and the lawpertinent thereto are, confessedly,, similar to those in the case of the plaintiff herein against C. L. Cole—No. 651, ante, p. 497, [105 Pac. 758]—an opinion in which has this day been filed.

It therefore follows that, upon the authority of said case No. 651, the judgment and the order appealed from herein, must be affirmed, and such is the order.

Chipman, P. J., and Burnett, J., concurred

Cites, in this corpus