In re the Estate of Shiveley
In the Matter of the Estate of W. B. SHIVELEY, DANIEL SHIVELEY and WILLIAM B. SHIVELEY, Administrators
- Area
- probate
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellants have failed to comply with supreme court rule No. 2, subdivision 4, [144 Cal. xl, 78 Pac. vii], requiring them to file their brief thirty days after the filing of the transcript. The motion is not contested, and as it has been more than three years since the transcript was filed and no brief has ever been filed, it seems to be peculiarly a case for the enforcement of said rule.
The appeal is dismissed.