Hill v. Hoefer
SAMUEL HILL v. JOSEPH HOEFER
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Hart (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Hart
HART, J.
The facts and the law involved in this case are admittedly the same as those involved in Hill v. Barner etc. et al., No. 410, this day decided.
A motion was made to dismiss the appeal in this case, but the same is without merit, and is, therefore, denied.
Upon the authority of Hill v. Barner et al., ante, p. 58, [96 Pac. 111], and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment and order are reversed.
Chipman, P. J., and Burnett, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Hill v. Barner Civ. No. 410. · 1908-04-07