Wright v. County of Sonoma
SAMPSON B. WRIGHT v. COUNTY OF SONOMA
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Hart (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Hart
HART, J.
This is a direct appeal to this court from the judgment and the order denying a motion for a new trial.
The plaintiff brought the action to recover judgment for the sum of $8,600, alleged to be due him from the defendant for supplying the latter with water to be used on certain public highways in said Sonoma county during certain seasons of the years 1903 and 1904.
It is plainly apparent from the ad damnum clause of the complaint that the case is, by direct appeal, beyond the appellate jurisdiction of this court. (Const., art. VI, sec. 4.)
It follows that we are required to transfer the appeal to the supreme court.
Such is the order.
Chipman, P. J., and Burnett, J., concurred.