In re Wein
In re EDWARD SIMON WEIN on Habeas Corpus
- Area
- other
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Opinion THE COURT.
We treat the petition as a motion to recall the remittitur in People v. Wein, 50 Cal.2d 383 [326 P.2d 457]. The motion is granted. The remittitur issued on June 27, 1958, is recalled. The judgment is vacated on counts 1, 5, 9, 14, 17, 18, 21, and is affirmed on all other counts. (People v. Daniels, 71 Cal.2d 1119, 1140 [80 Cal.Rptr. 897, 459 P.2d 225]; People v. Mutch, 4 Cal.3d 389 [93 Cal.Rptr. 721, 482 P.2d 633].)
Mosk, J., and Sullivan, J., did not participate.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Mutch Crim. 14182 · 1971-03-24
- People v. Daniels Crim. 10999 · 1969-10-02
- People v. Wein Crim. 6130 · 1958-05-27