Luberco, Ltd. v. Mills
LUBERCO, LTD. (a Corporation) v. MAE ANN MILLS
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Douglas L. Edmonds (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Edmonds
EDMONDS, J.
It has been stipulated by the parties that the record upon this appeal presents the same question of law as that brought to the court in Harless v. Carter, ante, p. 352 [267 P.2d 4]. For the reasons which have been stated in the decision of the Harless case, the judgment is affirmed.
Gibson, C. J., Carter, J., Traynor, J., Sehauer, J., and Spence, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Harless v. Carter L. A. 22469 · 1954-03-01