Pickens v. Superior Court
LAWRENCE L. PICKENS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a mandamus proceeding in which the judgments in consolidated actions reviewed on appeal in Pickens v. Johnson, ante, p. 399 [267 P.2d 801], are attacked on one of the grounds urged on that appeal. Inasmuch as the appeal disposes of that issue, the petition for the writ is denied and the alternative writ discharged. (See California Toll Bridge Authority v. Durkee, 40 Cal.2d 341 [253 P.2d 673].)
Dooling, J. pro tem, sat in place of the Chief Justice, who deemed himself disqualified.
Cites, in this corpus
- Pickens v. Johnson Sac. 6378 · 1954-03-01
- California Toll Bridge Authority v. Durkee Sac. No. 6370 · 1953-02-25