Gordon v. Rombotis

California Supreme Court · L. A. No. 21703 · 1951-12-11 · Published · 38 Cal. 2d 879 · 238 P.2d 992

SAMUEL J. GORDON v. ROBERT L. ROMBOTIS, Defendants ELBERT, LTD. (a Corporation)

Area: civil
Panel: Homer R. Spence (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Spence

SPENCE, J.

This is a quiet title action presenting questions similar to certain questions determined in two cases this day filed, Scheas v. Robertson, L. A. No. 21357, ante, p. 119 [238 P.2d 982] and Sipe v. Correa, L. A. No. 21421, ante, p. 131 [238 P.2d 989]. Upon the authority of and for the reasons stated therein, plaintiff was correctly adjudicated a “bona fide purchaser for value” and entitled to rely on the conclusive presumption found in the 1945 amendment of section 2911 of the Civil Code.

The judgment is affirmed.

Gibson, C. J., Shenk, J., Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Traynor, J., and Schauer, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Sipe v. Correa L. A. 21421 · 1951-12-11
Scheas v. Robertson L. A. 21357 · 1951-12-11