gno.law

Dabney v. Mann

California Supreme Court · L. A. No. 21861 · 1951-09-26 · Published · 37 Cal. 2d 884 · 235 P.2d 606

Estate of LOUISE E. DABNEY, CLIFFORD R. DABNEY v. MELVIN H. MANN

Area
civil
Panel
B R. Schauer (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Schauer

SCHAUER, J.

The parties and the issues concerned in this appeal are the same as those involved in Estate of Dabney (1951), ante, p. 402 [234 P.2d 962], in which we ordered dismissal of the appeal.

Here, Clifford and Alice Dabney appeal from an order of ratable distribution entered February 6, 1951, in the above entitled estate, to which they had objected in the probate court on the ground that as claimants adversely to the estate in their equitable suit (Los Angeles superior court action No. 569707, which is adequately discussed in the cited opinion) they were “persons interested in the estate” within the meaning of sections 1010 and 1011 of the Probate Code.

• For the reasons stated in the cited opinion and on the authority thereof, this appeal is' also dismissed.

Gibson, C. J., Shenk, J., Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Traynor, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus