Butte v. Distillery, Rectifying & Wine Workers International Union
FELIX BUTTE, Jr. v. DISTILLERY, RECTIFYING AND WINE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL NO. 45, etc.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Jesse W. Carter (author), John W. Shenk
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Carter
CARTER, J.
In this action plaintiffs’ prayer for injunctive relief is based upon the Hot Cargo Act (Lab. Code, §§ 1131-1136), and hence is controlled by the decision in In re Blaney, 30 Cal.2d 643 [184 P.2d 892]. Here a judgment of dismissal was entered after a demurrer was sustained. On the authority of the Blaney case, the judgment is affirmed.
Gibson, C. J., Edmonds, J., Traynor, J., Schauer, J., and Spence, J., concurred.
Dissent — Shenk
SHENK, J.—I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in In re Blaney, 30 Cal.2d 643, at page 661 [184 P.2d 892].
Cites, in this corpus
- In Re Blaney Crim. 4733 · 1947-10-03