Columbia Steel Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
COLUMBIA STEEL COMPANY (a Corporation) v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION and PAUL B. BARKER
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Jesse W. Carter (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Petitioner, a self-insurer, seeks to annul an order of the Industrial Accident Commission awarding compensation to an injured employee. The industrial injury occurred prior to the effective date of the 1945 amendment of Labor Code, section 4661, but the award was made pursuant to the provisions of the section as amended. The facts are substantially the same as those in Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., ante, p. 388 [182 P.2d 159], and for the reasons stated in that case it must be held that the commission improperly gave a retroactive effect to the amendment.
The award is annulled and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
Dissent — Carter
CARTER, J.
I dissent.
I dissent upon the same grounds stated in my dissenting opinion in Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., ante, p. 388 [182 P.2d 159], this day filed.
Respondents’ petition for a rehearing was denied July 22, 1947. Carter, J., voted for a rehearing.
Cites, in this corpus
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission S. F. 17417; S. F. 17418; S. F. 17419; S. F. 17420; S. F. 17421; S. F. 17422; S. F. 17423; S. F. 17424; S. F. 17425; S. F. 17426; S. F. 17427; S. F. 17428; S. F. 17429 · 1947-06-26