gno.law

Himes v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court · L. A. No. 18936 · 1946-03-19 · Published · 27 Cal. 2d 891 · 167 P.2d 189

EILEEN C. HIMES v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Area
civil
Panel
Roger J. Traynor (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

This case presents for determination the same questions which were decided in Siwel Co. v. County of Los Angeles (ante, p. 724 [167 P.2d 177]). It is conceded by counsel that the issues of fact and law in the two cases are identical, and that the Siwel decision will control the disposition of this appeal.

The judgment herein is reversed with directions to the trial court to overrule the general demurrer to appellant's complaint and to proceed in accordance with the views stated in Siwel Co. v. County of Los Angeles.

Dissent — Traynor

TRAYNOR, J,

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Siwel Co. v. County of Los Angeles, ante, p. 735.

Gibson, C. J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus