Chierotti v. San Francisco Police Department
JOHN CHIEROTTI v. SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Roger J. Traynor (author), Jesse W. Carter
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Traynor
TRAYNOR, J.
For the reasons set forth in the opinion in People v. Gonzales and Chierotti, Crim. 4382, this day decided, ante, p. 165 [124 P. 2d 44], the order denying the preliminary injunction is affirmed.
Gibson, C. J., Shenk, J., Curtis, J., and Edmonds, J., concurred.
Dissent — Carter
CARTER, J., Dissenting.
I dissent.
For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion this day filed in the case of People v. Gonzales and Chierotti, Criminal No. 4382, supra, I am of the opinion that the order denying the preliminary injunction should be reversed.
Houser, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Gonzales Crim. 4382 · 1942-04-02