Laughlin v. State
ELLA T. LAUGHLIN v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Jesse W. Carter (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Carter
CARTER, J. — Defendant herein appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County in favor of plaintiff, awarding $7,500 for the damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff as the result of the construction of a subway in the street fronting her property. This is one of a series of similar cases in which the facts, rights and liabilities, are substantially the same. All material legal questions here presented are disposed of in a decision this day filed in the case of Bose *876v. State of California, No. 16040, ante, p. 713 [123 Pac. (2d) 505], Upon the authorities there cited and for the reasons there given, the judgment herein is affirmed.
Shenk, J., Curtis, J., and Houser, J., concurred.
Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied April 2, 1942. Gibson, C. J., Edmonds, J., and Traynor, J., voted for a rehearing.
Cites, in this corpus
- Rose v. State of California S. F. 16040 · 1942-03-04