Speik v. Sutphin
FREDERICK A. SPEIK v. I. O. SUTPHIN
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Phil S. Gibson (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Gibson
GIBSON, J.
This is an action to quiet title and to obtain declaratory relief in respect to rights arising under an *765oil lease. The action raises the same issues as those presented in the companion case of Sutphin v. Speik, L. A. No. 17142 (ante, p. 195 [99 Pac. (2d) 652]), this day decided. On the authority of that ease the judgment is affirmed.
Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Curtis, J., Waste, C. J., Wood, J., pro tem., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.
Rehearing denied. Shenk, J., and Houser, J., did not participate.
Cites, in this corpus
- Sutphin v. Speik L. A. 17142 · 1940-02-29