Duc v. Blumenthal

California Supreme Court · L. A. No. 16666; L. A. No. 16667; L. A. No. 16668 · 1938-07-19 · Published · 11 Cal. 2d 780

HAZEL LE DUC v. MAURICE BLUMENTHAL, Appellants JOSEPH G. SAUCEDO v. MAURICE BLUMENTHAL, Appellants GEORGE A. ROLLE v. MAURICE BLUMENTHAL

Area: civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

These three cases are companion cases to McNeil v. Blumenthal, L. A. No. 16665. (ante, p. 566 [81 Pac. (2d) 567]) this day decided. They are before this court on motion of plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal of defendants from an order of the trial court granting relief pursuant to section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or to affirm the order. The question presented is identical with that determined in the McNeil case. Therefore, on that authority, the respective orders appealed from in these three eases are, and each of them is, hereby affirmed.

Cites, in this corpus

Duc v. Blumenthal L. A. No. 16666; L. A. No. 16667; L. A. No. 16668 · 1938-07-19