Wessels v. Superior Court
A. L. WESSELS v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF MENDOCINO
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE
The application for a writ of prohibition herein is denied.
The remedy of the petitioner is to first present his defense upon the hearing of the contempt proceedings and *404then, if found guilty of the contempt, to apply to a higher court for a writ of certiorari or habeas corpus. (Commercial Bank v. Superior Court, 192 Cal. 395, 397 [220 Pac. 422]; Drew v. Superior Court, 43 Cal. App. 651, 655 [185 Pac. 680].)
Cites, in this corpus
- Commercial Bank of Spanish America, Ltd. v. Superior Court S. F. No. 10712. · 1923-11-14
- Drew v. Superior Court Civ. No. 2047. · 1919-10-18