gno.law

Aronson & Co. v. Pearson

California Supreme Court · L. A. No. 8591 · 1926-08-29 · Published · 199 Cal. 781

ARONSON & COMPANY (a Corporation) v. ELIZABETH PEARSON

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order granting defendant’s motion to discharge an attachment. The facts leading up to the issuance of the attachment are stated in the opinion this day filed in the same action on the defendant’s appeal from a prior order denying her motion to discharge the same attachment. (Aronson & Co. v. Pearson, ante, p. 286 [249 Pac. 188].) At a time subsequent to the denial of such motion, the defendant again moved the court to discharge the attachment, basing her motion upon the grounds stated in her first motion, and the court thereupon made the order from which this appeal is taken. Upon the grounds stated in the said opinion, the order appealed from herein is reversed.

Rehearing denied.

Cites, in this corpus