Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings Bank
JOHN ROBERTS, Cross-defendant and v. SECURITY TRUST & SAVINGS BANK (a Corporation), as Executors, etc., Cross-complainants and Respondents SECURITY TRUST & SAVINGS BANK (a Corporation), Cross-defendants and Respondents UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY (a Corporation), Cross-defendant and
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
In its application for a writ of supersedeas pending the final determination of this action on appeal the petitioner admits that if the judgment as rendered by the trial court is affirmed in toto no prejudice will be suffered by it. The court has this day handed down its judgment affirming the judgment of the trial court as rendered.
For that reason the writ is denied.