gno.law

North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Fitch

California Supreme Court · Sac. No. 3561 · 1924-02-25 · Published · 193 Cal. 336

NORTH CONFIDENCE MINING AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (a Corporation) v. C. S. FITCH

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

The respondents moved to dismiss the appeal from the judgment taken by the appellants upon the ground that the notice of appeal - was filed too late. This question turns upon whether or not there was a motion pending for a new trial. Appellants claim that the notice of intention to move for a new trial was not properly served and filed. Since the hearing of the motion affidavits have been filed showing that the notice of intention to move for a new trial was properly served by mail. The notice *337of appeal from the judgment was filed within due time after the disposition of the motion for a new trial and the motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment is, therefore, denied.