Grinbaum v. Superior Court
JULIE GRINBAUM v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Curtis D. Wilbur (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Wilbur
WILBUR, C. J.
We have this day rendered decisions holding that the guardian of the person and the guardian of the estate of Julie Grinbaum were appointed by void orders. We have, also, held that by reason of these decisions it is unnecessary to pass upon the qualifications of the judge to try the proceedings for restoration to capacity because the respective proceedings for the appointment of the respective guardians of the person and estate were void and that the proceedings for restoration- to capacity based upon the validity of such orders of appointment must fall with the orders appointing the respective guardians. For the same reason it is unnecessary to issue a mandamus to compel the respondent judge to make an order for the taking of the depositions of certain individuals to be used upon the trial of the pending application of Julie Grinbaum for restoraton to capacity.
Petition dismissed.
Lawlor, J., Lennon, J., Kerrigan, J., Waste, J., and Myers, J., concurred.