In re Lapique
In the Matter of JOHN LAPIQUE, on Habeas Corpus
- Area
- other
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
[1] Any question of insufficiency of evidence to warrant an indictment is not a proper subject of inquiry on habeas corpus (In re Kennedy, 144 Cal. 634, [103 Am. St. Rep. 117, 1 Ann. Cas. 840, 67 L. R. A. 406, 78 Pac. 34]).
In so far as appears, the sufficiency of the indictment in this matter cannot be examined into on habeas corpus (In re Ruef, 150 Cal. 665, [89 Pac. 605]).
The application for a rehearing is denied.
Angellotti, C. J., Lawlor, J., Wilbur, J., and Olney, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Matter of Ruef Crim. No. 1391. · 1907-03-14
- In Re Kennedy Crim. No. 1176. · 1904-09-10