Heazelton v. Gas & Electric Co.
MARY B. HEAZELTON v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant J. B. FEUSTMANN v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant J. A. FAIRCHILD v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant M. P. LILIENTHAL v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant HENRY H. MEYERS v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant JAMES M. HUNT v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant B. S. HUBBARD v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant T. J. FIELD v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant D. B. FIFIELD v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant G. W. FISHER v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant H. S. BALL v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant BANK OF E. COOK SMITH, INC. (a Corporation) v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant INTERNATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION (a Corporation) v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant MARGARET LUTTS v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant REDDING SAVINGS BANK (a Corporation) v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant JOHN TENNANT MEMORIAL HOME (a Corporation) v. MONTEREY COUNTY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
In each of the above-entitled eases the judgment is affirmed, on the authority of San Francisco Theological Seminary v. Monterey County Gas and Electric Co., ante, p. 166, [175 Pac. 693].
Cites, in this corpus
- S.F. T. Seminary v. Monterey County G. & E. Co. S. F. No. 8149. · 1918-10-14