Steamship Bowdoin Co. v. Pillsbury
STEAMSHIP BOWDOIN COMPANY (a Corporation) v. A. J. PILLSBURY, as Members of the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission allowing compensation to one Sievers. Sievers was a seaman on the steamer “Bowdoin, ” which was owned by the petitioner for the writ. He *391received his injuries on said vessel, while it was lying in the harbor of Eureka, in this state.
The contention of the petitioner is that the Industrial Accident Commission has no jurisdiction to award compensation for injuries to seamen upon navigable waters. The recent decisions of this court in the two cases entitled North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission, ante, p. 346, [163 Pac. 199, 203], preclude the Sustaining of this claim.
The award is affirmed.
Rehearing denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission S. F. No. 7398. · 1917-02-03