Spreckels v. Spreckels
CLAUS A. SPRECKELS and RUDOLPH SPRECKELS, as Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Anna C. Spreckels v. ADOLPH B. SPRECKELS, CLAUS A. SPRECKELS and RUDOLPH SPRECKELS, as Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Anna C. Spreckels v. JOHN D. SPRECKELS, CLAUS A. SPRECKELS and RUDOLPH SPRECKELS, as Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Anna C. Spreckels, Appellants. v. ADOLPH B. SPRECKELS and JOHN D. SPRECKELS
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Shaw (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Shaw
SHAW, J.
The questions presented on these appeals are all determined in the opinion rendered in ease No. 6753, Spreckels v. Spreckels, ante, p. 775, this day decided. All of the actions had the same purpose and object and are based upon the same allegations. The last three actions were begun to avoid technical objections and doubts as to the proper parties to maintain the action. As we have decided that the actions are not maintainable at all, the question as to the parties in interest is immaterial.
The judgment in each of the above-entitled cases is affirmed.
Melvin, J., Henshaw, J., Lorigan, J., Sloss, J., Lawlor, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.
Rehearing denied.