Downing v. McGrath
W. S. DOWNING v. WILLIAM McGRATH, CHRISTIANA G. REAY, (No. 5457.) JOSEPH SCHODER v. WILLIAM McGRATH, CHRISTIANA G. REAY, (No. 5450.) C. E. GIFFARD v. WILLIAM McGRATH, CHRISTIANA G. REAY, (No. 5455.) HENRIETTA SCHAUBEL v. WILLIAM McGRATH, CHRISTIANA G. REAY, (No. 5456.) ANDREW L. EDWARDS v. WILLIAM McGRATH, CHRISTIANA G. REAY, (No. 5458.)
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
These eases, one and all,, present the same proposition decided in Dahler v. All Persons (S. F. No. 5622), ante, p. 160, [124 Pac. 995].
The so-called abstract of title and certificate thereto of date February 24, 1908, were improperly admitted for the reasons given in the Dahler case. Wherefore, in each of the above entitled cases the judgment and order refusing a new trial are reversed and the cause remanded.
Rehearing denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- Dahler v. All Persons, Etc. S.F. No. 5622. · 1912-06-22