gno.law

Cutten v. McCarthy

California Supreme Court · S. F. No. 5511; S. F. No. 5512; S. F. No. 5513 · 1911-09-08 · Published · 160 Cal. 809

JOSEPH E. CUTTEN v. P. H. McCARTHY, Mayor, etc., Respondents GEORGE B. SOMERS v. P. H. McCARTHY, Mayor, etc., Respondents THOMAS W. HUNTINGTON v. P. H. McCARTHY, Mayor, etc.

Area
civil
Panel
M. C. Sloss (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

These cases being exactly similar in all particulars to Barendt v. McCarthy, S. F. No. 5507, ante, p.' 680, in which the opinion was filed this day, the judgment of the lower court in each of them is, upon authority of that case, affirmed.

Dissent — Sloss

SLOSS, J., dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Barendt v. McCarthy, this day filed.

Beatty, O. J., and Angellotti, J., concurred.

Rehearing in each denied.