Reclamation Dist. No. 70 v. Blackmer
RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 70 v. WESLEY BLACKMER, Appellants RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 70 v. J. W. BROWNING, Appellants RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 70 v. J. W. SMITH, Appellants RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 70 v. C. R. WEIS, Appellants RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 70 v. ELIZABETH WINSHIP, Appellant RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 70 v. J. W. SMITH, Appellants RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 70 v. OLIVER E. WINSHIP, Appellants RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 70 v. HENRY WILDER, Appellants RECLAMATION DISTRICT No. 70 v. CHARLES HAVENS, Appellant RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 70 v. HENRY SILLS
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
It having been stipulated that decisions in the above entitled cases should depend upon the decision in Reclamation District No. 70 v. John Birks (Sac. No. 1784), ante, p. 233, [113 Pac. 170], this day decided, and that such judgment of this court as might be made and given in the case of Reclamation District No. 70 v. John Birks (Sac. No. 1784), ante, p. 233, [113 Pac. 170], should also be given in the above entitled cases.
It is ordered as to the above entitled cases, and each of them, that the judgment and order appealed from be reversed.
Hearing in Bank of each of above entitled eases respectively denied.
Beatty, C. J., dissented from the respective orders denying a hearing in Bank of each of above entitled cases.
Cites, in this corpus
- Reclamation Dist. No. 70 v. Birks Sac. No. 1784. · 1911-01-10