gno.law

Blizard v. Drinkhouse

California Supreme Court · S. F. No. 2655 · 1901-06-18 · Published · 6 Cal. Unrep. 695 · 65 P. 475

In re LAKEMEYER'S ESTATE. BLIZARD v. DRINKHOUSE

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal has been submitted. The ground of the motion is that appellant did not file his points and authorities in time. While the excuse given by one of appellant’s attorneys under oath is not entirely satisfactory, still we think it sufficient to save his client from the penalty of a refusal to hear his appeal on its merits, particularly as the points were on file at" the time of the hearing, and no delay was caused by the delinquency, which was only for a very short period. The motion is denied.