Bishop v. Glassen
BISHOP v. GLASSEN
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the COURT.
We have examined the transcript herein, and are of opinion that this case must be governed by the rulings of this court in Davis v. Scott, 56 Cal. 165, Hosmer v. Duggan, 56 Cal. 258, and McBrown v. Morris, 59 Cal. 64. This must result in an affirmance of the judgment. Conceding that the showing is sufficient to authorize the court to grant the motion here made, and vacate the judgment of affirmance heretofore rendered, it would be useless to do so where, upon the hearing, the like judgment must follow. The motion is therefore denied: Estate of Montgomery, 59 Cal. 584. Ordered accordingly.
Cites, in this corpus
- McBrown v. Morris No. 7,247 · 1881-07-15
- Davis v. Scott No. 6,597 · 1880-07-01