Ex parte Vinton
Ex Parte VINTON
- Area
- other
- Panel
- Charles H. Garoutte (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner discharged.
Dissent — Garoutte
GAROUTTE, J.
I dissent. The prisoner is discharged by the court upon the ground that he has not been brought to trial within sixty days after his commitment. I am well satisfied that the writ of habeas corpus cannot be invoked in a case of this character.
I concur: Temple, J.
Cited by
- People v. Wilson Crim. 7190 · 1963-07-09
- In Re Alpine Docket No. Crim. 3058. · 1928-03-29
- Ford v. Superior Court Civ. No. 1052. · 1911-08-15