Krouse v. Woodward
KROUSE v. WOODWARD
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Jackson Temple (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Temple
TEMPLE, J.
This is the same case as that already decided on the appeal of Woodward (Krouse v. Woodward, 110 Cal. 638, 42 Pac. 1084). The plaintiff has also appealed from that part of the judgment which denies him relief against Alexander and against the defendant corporation. The judgment is clearly right. By the indorsed assignment he made Woodward the apparent owner of the stock; and, when the court found that Alexander was a purchaser in good faith and for value, plaintiff had lost his case against Alexander. It did not matter that the stock stood on the books in plaintiff’s name. These indorsed certificates do pass from hand to hand, and such is a usual mode of selling stock. The judgment in favor of Alexander is affirmed.
We concur: McFarland, J.; Henshaw, J.
Cites, in this corpus
- Krouse v. Woodward No. 15972 · 1895-12-31
Cited by
- Powers v. Pacific Diesel Engine Co. Docket No. S.F. 12322. · 1929-01-30