gno.law

Sisson, Crocker & Co. v. Johnson

California Supreme Court · No. 18,102 · 1893-10-06 · Published · 4 Cal. Unrep. 265 · 34 P. 617 · 1893 Cal. LEXIS 1091

SISSON, CROCKER & CO. v. JOHNSON

Proceeding
appeal
Outcome
other — We concur: Fitzgerald, J.; McFarland, J.
Area
civil
Panel
Thomas E. Haven (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Haven

DE HAVEN, J.

Appeal from an order refusing to dissolve a preliminary injunction. The complaint states facts sufficient to justify the issuance of the injunction sought to be dissolved, and the court did not err in its ruling upon the motion to disolve the same. Order affirmed.

We concur: Fitzgerald, J.; McFarland, J.