gno.law

Sneath v. Waterman

California Supreme Court · No. 14,860 · 1892-02-12 · Published · 3 Cal. Unrep. 483 · 28 P. 1061

SNEATH v. WATERMAN

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The affidavit of service' upon the adverse attorney of the notice of motion to dismiss the appeal herein does not show that any attempt was made to serve him at his office between the hours of 8 o’clock A. M. and 6 o’clock P. M. of the day when the notice was left at his residence. The motion to dismiss is denied, without prejudice.

Harrison, J., being disqualified, took no part in the decision of the above motion.