White v. White
WHITE v. WHITE
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal from the judgment in this case on the ground of written interlineations in the transcript of the record. This is not ground for dismissing the appeal, nor was it so held in Green v. McMann, 79 Cal. 561, 21 Pac. 964.
There is also a motion to dismiss the appeal from an order allowing alimony. The order in this case is within the decision in Sharon v. Sharon, 67 Cal. 185, 7 Pac. 456, 635, 8 Pac. 709. We adhere to the ruling in that case. The certificate of the clerk of the superior court to the transcript is in all respects sufficient. Both motions are denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- Green v. McMann No. 13092 · 1889-07-02
- Sharon v. Sharon No. 9984 · 1885-06-29